Database statistics
To access free or premium statistics, you need one of our packages:
- Free package
(0 remaining views)
- Basic package
(0 remaining views)
- Advanced package
(0 remaining views)
- Expert package
(0 remaining views)
Responsibility for police costs for high-risk matches in a country comparison
The chart documents opinions on who should bear the costs of police and security at high-risk football matches, comparing responses from Germany and England (survey conducted in December 2023). Four cost-responsibility models are presented: the state, the participating clubs or teams, the league, and a combination of all parties.
In both countries, the two most frequently chosen options are cost-sharing across all parties and the participating clubs or teams. In Germany, 39% favor a combined model, while 37% point to the clubs involved. In England, the clubs option ranks first at 43%, with the combination model at 31%. Assigning responsibility solely to the state receives the lowest share in both countries — 14% in Germany and 10% in England. The league as sole cost-bearer is selected by 19% in Germany and 16% in England.
Source
Source
ONE8Y
Origin
Origin
Survey date
Survey date
12/12/2023
Survey country
Survey country
Germany, England
Sample
Sample
n=3,808 interested in soccer (top 2 on a 4-point scale) of which n=1,774 from Germany and n=2,034 from England
Question
Question
In your opinion: Who should bear the cost of police & security at high risk games? The state, clubs/teams involved, the league or a combination of all?